It appears that [Mr. Reznor](http://www.nin.com/) is working in an [alternate reality game](http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alternate_reality_game) to help hype up the approaching release of his new album, [year zero](http://yearzero.nin.com/).
**WARNING**: Many of the links below go to sites with fractured web design and possibly disturbing text, images, or sound. Click at your own risk.
The plot seems to involve some sort of military drug called “Parepin”, and an underground resistance, set some time in the future. The first site, [IAmTryingToBelieve.com](http://www.iamtryingtobelieve.com/), was found by reading the bold letters on the new tour t-shirts. Subsequent sites found include:
* [Another Version Of The Truth](http://anotherversionofthetruth.com/), which contains a “resistance” message board hidden in the depths.
* [Be The Hammer](http://bethehammer.net/), a website belonging to a soldier in the 105th Airborne Crusaders.
* [105th Airborne Crusaders](http://105thairbornecrusaders.com/default.htm), “the proudest unit in the service of protecting and policing God’s green earth.”
* [The First Evangelical Church of Plano](http://churchofplano.com/), a church that practices “neighborhood cleansing”.
* [Consolidated Mail Services](http://www.consolidatedmailsystems.com/), some sort of citizen…mail service, I guess.
The [Unfiction boards](http://forums.unfiction.com/forums/viewtopic.php?t=18272) are starting to buzz, but the [echoingthesound board](http://www.echoingthesound.org/phpbbx/viewtopic.php?t=20265) is running away with it.
The game is apparently being PMed by [42entertainment](http://www.echoingthesound.org/phpbbx/viewtopic.php?t=20265), they of ILoveBees.
Wish I had time to contribute, but I’m just going to have to read the summary from afar.
(Thanks to Ryan Godinez for much of the information for this post.)
NYC blog-types are up in arms today over [Carl Kruger’s proposed “no-ipod-or-cellphone-while-walking” ban](http://www.gothamist.com/archives/2007/02/07/banning_ipod_ce.php).
> “While people are tuning into their iPods and cell phones, they’re tuning out the world around them… If you want to listen to your iPod, sit down and listen to it. You want to walk in the park, enjoy it. You want to jog around a jogging path, all the more power to you, but you should not be crossing streets and endangering yourself and the lives of others.”
It’s good to know that after a landmark election, particular in NY state, we are still giving government jobs to the batshit insane.
Before we get to the snark, here’s the simple, logical response I’ve been pitching in response all morning:
* If you’re crossing a street – with or without an iPod – in such a way that you are a danger to traffic and those around you, then you must not have the right of way.
* Logically, this means you are crossing against the light.
* This, of course, means that you are jaywalking, which is literally defined as “to cross or walk in the street or road unlawfully or without regard for approaching traffic.”
* We already have laws against jaywalking that are barely enforced.
* Why do we need another law?
Okay, on to the snark. Other distractions to ban around NYC:
* **Tourists that stop dead on the sidewalk of Times Square.** I’m constantly running into people taking pictures or gawking at neon signs. This is dangerous.
* **Stairs.** They are often slippery and/or wet, causing injury and possible death.
* **Rain.** Rain is distracting. Also, wet. Again, safety hazard!!!
* **Children.** Not only are they a distraction, they are a waste of taxpayer resources.
* **Cars.** Did you know the #1 cause of accidents on NYC’s roads are automobiles? It’s true! They must be banned immediately.
* **Light.** Our tourist friends have proven that any sort of shining object can lead to a disaster. Total darkness is much safer.
* **Evening.** On second though, plenty of bad things happen in the dark. Why, 74% of NYC crime occurs between the hours of 6PM and 6AM! Let’s get rid of 12 hours in the day.
* **Sound.** What’s more frightening than a car backfiring, a glass breaking, or a loud siren? Abolish noise, and we can focus on the task at hand – putting one foot in front of the other, repeatedly.
* **Knowledge.** You know the saying about curiosity killing the cat? ONE DEAD CAT IS TOO MANY PEOPLE.
I look forward to our non-existence going forward.
I have found a new television show to love. And like many television shows I love, it is nearly impossible to watch in the US. The show in question is QI, or Quite Interesting. And the structure for it is indeed quite interesting – to quote the official site:
Quite Interesting – or ‘QI’ to its friends – could loosely be described as a comedy panel quiz. However, none of the stellar line-up of comedians is expected to be able to answer any questions, and if anyone ends up with a positive score, they can be very happy with their performance. Points are awarded for being interesting or funny (and, very occasionally, right) but points are deducted for answers which merely repeat common misconceptions and urban myth. It’s okay to be wrong, but don’t be obviously, boringly wrong. In this way, QI tries to rid the world of the flotsam of nonsense and old wives’ tales that can build up in your mind. QI not only makes us look more closely at things, it encourages us to question all the received wisdom we have carried with us since childhood. Think of the program as a humorous cranial de-scaler.
QI features a panel of four comedians, the likes of which have included Hugh Laurie, Jimmy Carr, Clive Anderson, and Peter Serafinowicz among others. The show is hosted by the sublime Stephen Fry, and permanently installed guest Alan Davies plays the “intellectual counterpoint”, as it were.
In many ways, the show resembles long-form improv comedy. The panel starts with a question relevant to the season they’re in (more on this later), and the show drifts gently in whichever direction the conversation flows. Occasionally Mr. Fry must bring the show back into focus with another themed question, but it seems that by the end of the show, things have a habit of wrapping back into themselves. Which is undoubtedly the whole point of the show: to tease out the connections between things, to find the unintended comedy in what we’ve been indoctrinated over the years.
Regarding the seasons: rather than numbering the seasons of QI, they are lettered, and the major questions in each episode all deal with subjects that start with that letter. QI is the intellectual equivalent of Sufjan Steven’s Fifty States Project. Of course, with Sufjan only two albums in, and QI starting to tape the E season, Mr. Stevens will have some catching up to do.
Some in the audience may be rolling their eyes, thinking “there goes Dan with another show no one watches again”. It’s worth noting that the best selling book on Amazon UK in the last quarter of 2006 was the QI book, and that the show outperforms the typical BBC average ratings by over 600%. It is, seemingly, wildly popular.
Ratings and global media empires aside, the one thing that sold me on QI more than anything else was their philosophy, which I’d like to quote a few portions of before linking to a video:
…The world brims and bulges with interesting information, but these days it rarely reaches us. A preference for the quick fix on the part of both consumer and corporation offers increasingly materialist, visceral satisfaction. We want it easy and cheap and we want it now. Fashion, celebrity, pornography, lottery. The culture is withered and lame, flashy and shallow. They’re just not interesting… …Whatever is interesting we are interested in. Whatever is not interesting, we are even more interested in. Everything is interesting if looked at in the right way. At one extreme, QI is serious, intensely scientific, deeply mystical; at the other it is hilarious, silly and frothy enough to please the most indolent couch-potato… …And this is the point of QI: it is worthwhile. It is ‘autotelic’ – worth doing for its own sake. And it echoes the venerable mission statement of Lord Reith’s BBC: to educate, inform and entertain…
Amen.
Below was a clip of one of the episodes from YouTube; it begins with a discussion of Barbara Streisand’s moustache, and proceeds as one would expect. (The video has been delisted, alas.)
QI has enough appeal that it spurred my first and only order from Amazon UK over this past weekend. I hope that you, too, will find it quite interesting.
