Categories
Found

Apple Reveals Some Of Leopard’s Spots

Apple has put up the first of their [Leopard Technology Series for Developers](http://developer.apple.com/leopard/overview/index.html). If you’re interested in some of the technological improvements to the next version of OS X, this is a must-read.

Some of these items were covered by the WWDC NDA previously, such as the formalization of resolution independence, major enhancements to OpenGL performance through offloading to another core, and Quicktime support for USB cameras.

But there’s also a few new pieces of information, or at least information I may have missed on my track:

>Leopard brings several new security enhancements to Mac OS X. The first of these is the adoption of the Mandatory Access Control (MAC) framework. This framework, original developed for TrustedBSD, provides a fine-grained security architecture for controlling the execution of processes at the kernel level. This enables sandboxing support in Leopard. By sandboxing an application, using a text profile, you can limit an application to being able to just access only the system features, such as disk or the network, that you permit.
>Also new in Leopard is code signing. This means that Leopard will be able to identify applications by using digital signatures and then use that identification to base trust decisions on.

It amuses me greatly that people continue to advocate that the only reason Apple hasn’t had a major OS X security exploit in over five years is because of market share, and not because they continue to make major advances in the security of the operating system.

As a colleague said after I pasted him this information: Sandboxing FTW.

Categories
Puzzled Over

Citigroup Needs A CluePod

Marketwatch is reporting that [Citigroup hires buffoons](http://www.marketwatch.com/News/Story/Story.aspx?guid=%7B83E83BF9%2D6CD7%2D4D36%2D994E%2DFB7F2BCF63AC%7D&siteid=mktw&dist=nbs):

> Citigroup cut Apple Computer to hold from buy, citing valuation. The broker told clients it sees little potential for revenue upside versus consensus in the third or fourth quarter of the year. It said gross margin upside should yield 4 cents to 6 cents of earnings-per-share upside in both quarters but that this is largely priced into the shares. On the product front, Citigroup said recent checks suggest that Apple is unlikely to introduce a new video iPod with a larger screen and “virtual click wheel” before the peak holiday season, as the broker had hoped.

It’s a shame that textual blogging is not effected by timespace, because I would love to just replay the words *”as the broker had hoped”* for a straight thirty seconds. Why would the broker hope such a thing? Oh, right, [the damn rumor sites](https://vjarmy.com/archives/2006/09/three_little_words.php).

Is this how the financial world really works? Someone reads rumor sites, sees that the rumors don’t come true, and then downgrades the company because of it? This is lunacy, sheer and unbridled.

I’m not against financial decisions based on the reality of the situation – say, if the refresh of the entire iPod line had not yielded anything of interest. In my limited experience, this is not the case. There is a lot of interest in the new Shuffle, reasonable interest in the new Nano, and the new iPod Video certainly isn’t dissuading people from purchasing it. Never mind the *rest* of Apple’s product line, which I’ve never seen so much interest in.

But don’t let me stomp on your dreams, Citigroup.

Categories
Narrated

The Incredible Invincible Hard Drive

Despite all of my technology training and knowledge, occasionally I manage to do something immensely stupid to my computers. I am not immune to stupid keystrokes or misreading instructions. I have hardware issues just the same as everyone else.

Rarely, however, are such problems fixed by magic.