« September 2006 | Main | November 2006 »

October 27, 2006

It's been a long time, I shoudn't've left you...

So I know it's been quite a time, so let's just hit the important notes:

- My thumb is pretty well healed up at this point. No more bandages or anything. I still have a slight impression where the chunk was taken out, but it's growing back in.

- I worked in bowling shoes the other week. It wasn't the optimal situation, but it was either that, bowling shoes (terrible traction, unless they choose to install a grass field in the deli), or flip-flops (generally frowned upon in a work environment, unless you're a professor and you're also wearing socks). Bowling shoes were the only suitable option in my car. Which leads to the question "why were you sleeping in your car?" I wasn't, don't worry. I was staying over at a woman's place (who I've recently been dating) and realized in the morning that I had left work clothes in my car, but no shoes.

- I haven't seen a movie in about a month. I know, there is something seriously wrong with that. I just have such a bad schedule for it. My classes are at just the wrong times, and then I have homework to do, and then there's work in the mornings so I don't want to be out too late too often, and I actually have some sort of social life now as well. But if I can somehow find a way, I plan on going on some major spree one of these weeks. Or at the very least, when I'm out of class in December I will go on a major movie binge.

- I finally updated some photos as well on my Flickr account. I know it's only four, but it's a start. And like the movies it's another thing that I'm hoping to get going again. Not sure how many people check into that though (other than like Dan and Katie who have basically set me up with all of this, so they are almost obligated to). But just in case you were wondering, I am looking to try and do that more, to see more movies, and to post more (goes hand in hand with the movies really).

- And congrats to Cross and Em. Anyone who actually reads this probably already knows by now, but they have recently gotten engaged, leaving only three of us Quarry people left (four if you include Ingrid as well). So let the pools begin for who is next to wed! And for who with be the first to bear offsping. Personally I think my money is on Ingrid and Neil/Rachel.

And I know that this is rather short, but this is a rare Friday that I have no class or work, and I need to go relax, enjoy, and get some women's clothes together for tonight (Halloween party; I'll explain and post pics about it later).

October 11, 2006

A thumb and a half is better than no thumbs at all.

So just a few quick notes and updates for everyone...

- I just found out that Lou Gramm (lead singer from Foreigner) is from Rochester. I feel like I should have known this sooner. I think he may now be my favorite famous Rochesterian. How can he not be? (Close second - Phillip Seymor Hoffman).

- Note to Brockport school paper: Baking Soda is not an alternative to alcohol. I think what you may have been looking for is club soda? Better luck next time.

- "Creationism Makes Sense" Please tell me that the person who wrote this column in the Brockport school paper wasn't being serious. There were just so many things so wrong with his reasoning and arguements. Please tell me he was trying to pull a Colbert.

- I'm sick of people telling me that the Saints are better this year because they had to play 16 road games last year. No. First, they are better because they actually have a QB this year (have you seen what Brooks has done in Oakland?). Also, the addition of Bush was hugh (even if he is a decoy and hasn't produced on the superstar level, yet). But mainly, they didn't play 16 road games last year. Sure they didn't play in NO (so they had no real home games), but playing Buffalo in San Antonio is not a road game. It's a neutral site game. Going through the schedule I'm willing to grant them 9 road games, not 16. Still not an excuse for last season. Last season they just plain sucked. No other excuses.

- I am now officially a part of the Wegmans Deli group. Yesterday at work I managed to slice the tip off my right thumb. I'm fine, don't worry about that. Had to leave work early and go have it checked out, but nothing too serious. It's gonna have to be wrapped up for a couple days, then just bandades for the next while until it's totally healed (probably will take a while as I took a good chunk out of there). I did get to hear a good number of other "slicing" stories from other co-workers (along with my boss showing me how she's sort of "widdled" down her index fingers from slicing them; that's encouraging...).

That's it for now, seeing as how I haven't gotten to any movies recently. But I do promise I more ranting post soon (thumb injury willing).

October 5, 2006

The Scenario...

Let me all pose a question to you. Suppose you are currently employed at a $40K per year job that requires a lot of work in and out of the office. Now this job may be difficult at the moment, but it will also train you well so you can get a decent job in the future. Probably nothing spectacular, but something that will pay you $30-$60K a year until you retire. That's a pretty respectable situtation.

However, what if you were presented with an opportunity to transfer to another job at a different company. This new job will have more responsibility, lots of required business travel, and doesn't have the greatest job security. However, your starting salary for this new job will be in the neighborhood of $1-$2 million dollars a year for four years, with the possibilty of a significant raise at the end of your fourth year of service with the company.

There is no absolute guarantee that you will get the new job. Would you take the risk? Would you look down on others who choose to?

I know many people would take the safe route here (I can't personally say that I would unless I knew the exact odds on getting the new job), but I can't say that I'd look down on others for choosing to try out this path.

But really, what I've just described is the proposition facing many college basketball players. Do they stay in school or try out the NBA? Too many sports commentators are too quick to tell players to stay in school. They argue that the graduation rates for many major programs are far too low and that it's a terrible trend. And I know that a college diploma is a great goal to strive for, and it would make many parents proud to see their son get one, but is it worth the chance at losing out at millions of dollars?

I know that there are a few issues that aren't presented in the above scenario. For one, graduating college does not mean you won't make it into the NBA, however it would mean that you'd cut into your productive NBA career by another 1-4 years (depending on when you leave college), costing you millions. But maybe you're game would improve in those extra years in college as you matured, hence lengthing your NBA career, thus making you millions more.

But to look at a similar situation in college football look at Matt Leinart (many of these points could be carried over to football as well, however with the NFL's policy you have to be out of highschool for two years before being eligible, so there's not so much jumping from college so soon). He won the heisman after his junior year, and was almost certain to be the first choice in the NFL draft, but he chose to remain in college another year. In the end, he slipped way down (mid-first round, big loss of money in the NFL). True he's still going to make millions, but he lost out on millions as well, and it's hard to say that he learned that much more in his final year of school (based on his hold-out this preseason I'd say he only learned how to be more of a big spoiled baby). A similar thing could happen if you have a great NCAA Tourny. Why not go out while you're stock is soaring?

You must also consider the odds of getting injured. If it happens in college, you're screwed. Not only do you lose out on the NBA, but you probably also have a chance at losing your scholarship and missing out on college as well (although I don't know how many colleges are really that cold).

But the biggest thing, what if you don't get drafted? This is always a concern with only having about 30-40 significant slots in the NBA draft (once you get too deep into the second round it's really not substantial). If you miss that you've given up your academic eligibility, so you're done with school (unless you choose not to hire an agent, an option that is too often not chosen; or you could choose to pay for it yourself, an option not really available to a lot of the people who make the jump). But if you were relatively sure that you would go in the first round and a half, why not give it a chance? Worse case, you go play in Europe or Asia. And maybe you can work your way into the NBA later. I mean it's not like too many of these "student" atheletes are gonna do much in the business world anyway. How many really attend classes or have a real major? My estimate of a stable $30-$60K a year job might be a little generous even.

And let's consider the idea of college being a $40K a year job. First, the $40K is probably a little high for most schools (although they are working their way up there), and this assumes that you get a full ride. Plus, being a student athlete means you most likely won't have time outside of school and athletics for a part-time job, so you're really not making that much money. You're more likely just getting enough to get by. Now I know that most non-student athletes aren't getting that much support, so I'm not saying you should feel sorry for the student-athletes, I'm just saying that when presented with the chance at going from just scraping by to being well off, most would jump at it. That is how the Lotto keeps going after all.

But let's look at best/worst case here. Let's pretend that you could be guaranteed an $80K a year job, with the kind of security that you'd still be doing it into your 50's (yeah, that'll happen). Or, you could get paid about $5 million over 4 years, and then disappear. Well you'd have to work over 50 years at your $80K job to get that kind of money. 50 years of work or an early retirement after 4 years as a failure? I think my ego could take the hit and retire at the ripe old age of 25.

So before you go on telling kids to stay in school, consider all the facts. No college can be expected to have a 100% graduation rate from it's sports teams. Hell no school has a 100% rate from the non-student athletes (I've checked and Cornell's is at about 90%, but that study was done by the school, so who knows how accurate that really is). If you really want to keep kids in college, let them get paid somehow. The schools certainly make millions off them and the NCCA tourney. You can't blame them for wanting a slice of the profits being made off of them. So until that day comes (probably never), stop trying to tell college basketball (and football) players that they have to stay in school and have a diploma to fall back on. After all, having a degree in Communications, from classes that you probably never really attended or paid attention to cause you were focused on making it to the NBA, isn't really something to fall back onto.

Fearless

I know my movie reviews have been a little infrequent lately. This is partially because I haven't had much time to write about the movies I've seen, but mostly because I haven't had many chances to see much of anything. I'm hoping to change that up soon though and get back onto a schedule of at least two movies a week. However, giving myself more time to reflect upon what I have seen has eliminated that bias towards over-praising anything halfway decent. That having been said let's look at Fearless.

Touted as Jet Li's final martial arts epic, I thought I should go take a look. Jet Li is a fantastic martial artist actor, and once again he does very well with the work in this film. However, it just isn't as good as some other things I've seen come out of China (including other things from Li himself). The fighting was well done, but the story was (although "based on actual events") tired. The movie is based around a fighter who as a child who gets into martial arts, but for all the wrong reasons, but still rises to be a fantastic fighter, but a sub-par person. After being too brash he loses what is left of his family, falls off the face of the earth, winds up in an old rural village where he rediscovers himself (learning to see from a blind girl! Wow, can we be more cliche?). He eventually comes back home and tries to mend his old ways and burnt bridges, leading him to defend his country's honor in the face of foreign imperialists. Yes, very nice and shows us all a lesson of redemption, but I've heard it before. In fact it seems like we hear something like this every year. And the action and stunts in this film didn't save the story. And although my 2 years of Chinese doesn't make me an expert in the language, the acting itself was also sub-par. And that other typical saving graces of Chinese action films, the beautiful settings and scenes, just wasn't there. It seemed to mostly take place in the same old city streets that we always see in films. Even the rural village wasn't all that pretty. I've seen the country, it's a beautiful and diverse land. How can you not work some of that in there?

So in the end, the action was nice. The message that the two greatest fighters in the world were from Japan and China was funny (although probably accurate as well). But the acting, story, and settings were all sub-par. It just didn't fit together as a great movie. If they had made it as a purely action movie maybe I could have enjoyed it more, but pairing it with the story just detracted from that in my mind.

RATING: Worth a Dollar Theatre Visit, Worth a Low Level Netflix (although I'd reccommend getting a better movie from the same genre instead).